Digiday reporting: Many publishers are ignoring the mobile storm that threatens to upend their businesses.
The
basics are straightforward. The screen is tiny; fewer ads are placed on
a mobile page than on desktop; mobile ad units are barely readable, if
not usable. Most importantly, publishers are trying to fit the model of
rectangles of desktop ads onto a phone — old print formats carried over
from the desktop Web. The math bears this out: A mobile user for nearly
all publishers is worth a fraction what a desktop user is.
Present
this case to many publishers, and you’ll hear stalling tactics. It’s
still early, they’ll say. Mobile users are “additive,” they’ll claim.
Mobile banners are sure to improve and close the yawning gap with
desktop, you’ll be assured. But what if that’s not the case? What if
mobile starts to eat up a big chunk of their traffic — say 40 percent —
under the current economics? That’s trouble. Just ask Facebook, which
has seen a huge chunk of its audience shift to mobile and is now
struggling to come up with an ad product that works there.
“I
suspect a lot of us traditional publishers don’t have a completely
comprehensive plan in place yet,” said Jay Lauf, publisher of The
Atlantic, which gets about 10 percent of its traffic via mobile.
There’s a huge revenue gap on mobile even though smartphone penetration is above 50 percent in
the U.S. Yet publishers are still, as one noted, approaching mobile
like gum on a shoe: a minor inconvenience that can just be scraped
off. Publishers are still trying to place traditional concepts of
advertising onto new media are finding their problems exacerbated by the
dearth of inventory.
http://www.digiday.com/publishers/the-mobile-maelstrom/?utm_source=Daily+Buzz+from+eMedia+Vitals&utm_campaign=ad9c024925-nl_DB_08_30_2012&utm_medium=email
No comments:
Post a Comment