MondayNote reporting: Every newspaper, magazine or website is working on a paywall of sorts and closely monitoring what everyone else is doing.
In almost every news company, execs are morosely watching advertising
projections and finding numbers that are not exactly encouraging. For
digital media, there is no way around this year’s weak outlook: the bad
economic climate only adds to the downward price pressure exerted by the
ever growing inventory of web and mobile pages. In a best-case
scenario, volumes and prices will remain flat. On the print circulation
side, Western newspapers are likely to witness a continuing readership
erosion at a rate of several percentage points.
But here is the interesting point: The strongest
players don’t just bow to the inevitable, they accelerate their
transition to digital. This week, I was struck by the fact two such
leaders made the same move: The New York Times and the Financial Times
both announced serious price hike for their newsstand price
(respectively 25% and 13.6%) :
- The NYT moves from $2.00 (€1.57) to $2.50 (€1.96) from Monday to
Saturday, with no change for the Sunday edition still priced at $5
(€3.92) in New York, and $6 (€4.72) elsewhere.
- The FT goes from £2.20 ($3.39 or €2.66) to £2.50 ($3.85 or €3.03) on
weekdays, as the weekend edition moves from £2.80 ($4.32 or €3.39 ) to
£3 ($4.62 or €3.63).
Those numbers are really meaningful: a 10% increase
every two years or so can be seen as an inflation adjustment — a
generous one considering the inflation rate in those countries to be
about 2.5%-3.5%. At 25% increase is a strategic decision aimed at
accelerating the switch to digital. (The paper version of the FT now
costs 25% more than it did last October).
Interestingly enough, for a New York Times addict, reading the paper
online with the cheapest package ($15 a month), is now 40% to 50%
cheaper that the home-delivered version and 70% cheaper than buying the
paper each day at a newsstand. As for the FT, the standard digital
version is now 21% cheaper than the print subscription and 68% less than
the newsstand price.
Both are working hard at converting readers to the digital paid-for
model. The FT is heading full steam into digital, furiously data-mining
its 4 million subscribers base to convert them into paid-for subscribers
(250,000 according to the most recent count). The FT’s tactics is
simple: readers are relentlessly pushed toward the paywall thanks to a
diminishing number of stories available for free: from 30 free articles
per month in 2007 it is now down to 8 articles; the other bold move is
making registration mandatory in order to access even a single story.
The Times builds its paid-for strategy on three key factors:
1 / The uniqueness of its content...
2 / The managed porosity of its paywall...
3 / Getting in bed with Apple...
Of these three factors, the uniqueness of content remains the most potent one...
http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/01/08/cracking-the-paywall/
No comments:
Post a Comment