Saturday, June 18, 2011

Does a new report mean doom and gloom for local online news? Maybe, but here are a few balancing factors

NiemanLab reporting:
Matthew Hindman’s new paper showing miserably low levels of local online news consumption is a terrific addition to research on how journalism gets produced and consumed online. He found, using panel data from comScore, that local news sites received, on average, only about three pageviews per person per week in their local markets.
And that’s in total, adding up all local news sites — individual sites fared even worse. The largest local news site in a typical market reached only about 17.8 percent of local web users in a given month, and it drew only about five minutes of the typical web user’s attention during that month.
Nikki Usher summarized the report’s findings for us in a separate post. But while Hindman’s research is a welcome reminder of local online news’ limitations and failings, I think there are a number of factors that complicate his findings a bit. Here are four reasons why I think the doom and gloom that I expect to circle around this report might not be spot on.

comScore’s dataset isn’t perfect...
Reach does not mean impact
Local news does not equal “news”
Watch your comparison sphere

http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/06/does-a-new-report-mean-doom-and-gloom-for-local-online-news-maybe-but-here-are-few-balancing-factors

No comments:

Post a Comment